The main argument behind the article, is that the excessive amount of money TUT is putting into their WC3-squad is twisting the salary expectations for all the WC3 players. It does hold some truth, as money given to Player A will give Player B a better understanding of what he is worth; as in if Player B is better than Player A he will want to recieve more money than him.

That is pretty logical. But the rest of the equation just falls apart when the author wants to blame TUT. Because there has to be an organization to pay Player B the amount he wants. If there isn't, then Player B will have to lower his expectations to his salary to get a contract. Now, where in that part does TUT hold any responsibility?