CS:Source has a future?

TheSupervisor · 18th Feb 2007, 20:47 CET

Hi folks :P,

Do y'all think CS:S can finally take off? Some teams are joining up divisions of CS:S to attend some events. IMO that's a signal which indicates the crescent professionalization of the game!

Tell what y'all think about!

[]'s

mussoO- · 18th Feb 2007, 21:05 CET

I don't like CS:S... There's a lot of bugs on it. Waiting for CS Promod

TheSupervisor · 18th Feb 2007, 21:15 CET

musso, I like CS:S because the game feels smoother than CS 1.6 but the most important point of the bugs is: several bugs of CS:S are in the hitboxes... I think VALVe could fix it and make the game more professional, while this don't occur we can do nothing further.

Just MO.

kaoz_ · 19th Feb 2007, 00:30 CET

Yes, but cs:s are sucks

adn · 19th Feb 2007, 02:32 CET

I think CSS definatley has a future. The CGS is hoping to put so much money in to CSS that there wont be much choice between 1.6 and CSS :P

However, I don't think it will hate Europe as hard as it has hit the states. At least not for a long time

ShamRock · 19th Feb 2007, 06:38 CET

CS:S rather lets say CS Promode we all know what Arqon can do with his skills (seen in CPMA and Q4Max) CS Promode is the next CS Game thats for sure. Its only a matter of time once the bugs n hitbox values are fixed. It seems CS Promode is almost complete on what i have gathered from sources.

I think the beta testing should start pretty soon.

19th Feb 2007, 07:46 CET

CSS sucks fosho. But if tournaments decides to use the crappy version of CS then most team will have to follow their leads even if they hate it with a passion.

But if CSS takes off, I hope CS1.6 becomes a legend, just like Starcraft

the game will never die!

Ooopek · 19th Feb 2007, 17:03 CET

it has a future.
like someone sad there is so much money puting in this game, it must have a bright future.

mulisha · 19th Feb 2007, 17:15 CET

#6!

OnceUponTime · 19th Feb 2007, 17:26 CET

CS:S is more enjoyable to spectate and more lovely to play. I ain´t good in cs 1.6 or CS:S but the graphics plays too much in this case for me...

imported_clyde · 19th Feb 2007, 18:20 CET

CS:S are the best game ever. 1.6 is low!
The graphic is terrible in 1.6 it makes no fun.

mulisha · 19th Feb 2007, 22:54 CET

Graphics don't make a game, i find cs:s slow and also a hell of alot easier.

mussoO- · 20th Feb 2007, 21:19 CET

yeah. it is easier than 1.6. and there's not a lot of people in Brazil who have a great computer to run the game.

20th Feb 2007, 22:20 CET

There are 2 types of community here:

1.6
We are the real competitive gamers
We are the pioneers of counterstrike.
We are the ones who know how to play cs
We care about the gameplay, not the graphics.
We aim the heads for headshots.
We don't have to spend $3000 to play.
We know Valve's a bitch

source
We aim legs for headshots.
We run around just to check out the amazing graphics that might set our computer on fire.
We love spending $3000.
We hate 1.6 because its too tough
We play for the graphics!Not Gameplay!
We love the flashbang in source
and we love the bugs..
did i mention we love the graphics?

cr1stal · 20th Feb 2007, 22:42 CET

the graphics are better for on tv to watch, so it depends on what the media dous. If the television wants a e-sports programme they probably choose source and everybody goes source.

tOxzj · 21st Feb 2007, 06:55 CET

cs:s is colouring book for children!

technics · 21st Feb 2007, 09:03 CET

ur being a 1.6 fanboy apm, atleast try to be neutral when u make comparisons :]

shifty_ · 21st Feb 2007, 11:57 CET

I always thought of CS:S as being a newbie version, people who cant play 1.6 :P

OnceUponTime · 22nd Feb 2007, 17:28 CET

We aim the heads for headshots.

That can´t go for CS 1.6 or CS:S! I Laughed so hard how the fuck "Random" shooting got headshots (aiming just before him and guy who was like 800 m in front of him got headshot)

22nd Feb 2007, 18:50 CET

#16 i tried trust me.

#18 at least 1.6 is less random than source thats fosho

18th Feb 2007, 21:05 CET	#2
mussoO- Adequate Citizen Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 252	I don't like CS:S... There's a lot of bugs on it. Waiting for CS Promod __________________ De olhos fechados mas com a mente bem aberta!

18th Feb 2007, 21:15 CET	#3
TheSupervisor Junior Citizen Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 51	musso, I like CS:S because the game feels smoother than CS 1.6 but the most important point of the bugs is: several bugs of CS:S are in the hitboxes... I think VALVe could fix it and make the game more professional, while this don't occur we can do nothing further. Just MO. __________________ Non ducor, duco.

19th Feb 2007, 00:30 CET	#4
kaoz_ Junior Citizen Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 30	Yes, but cs:s are sucks __________________ Dj Tiesto - Extacy

19th Feb 2007, 02:32 CET	#5
adn Adequate Citizen Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 381 My Mood:	I think CSS definatley has a future. The CGS is hoping to put so much money in to CSS that there wont be much choice between 1.6 and CSS :P However, I don't think it will hate Europe as hard as it has hit the states. At least not for a long time __________________ only dead fish go with the flow...

20th Feb 2007, 21:19 CET	#13
mussoO- Adequate Citizen Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 252	yeah. it is easier than 1.6. and there's not a lot of people in Brazil who have a great computer to run the game. __________________ De olhos fechados mas com a mente bem aberta!

18th Feb 2007, 20:47 CET	#1
TheSupervisor Junior Citizen Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 51	Hi folks :P, Do y'all think CS:S can finally take off? Some teams are joining up divisions of CS:S to attend some events. IMO that's a signal which indicates the crescent professionalization of the game! Tell what y'all think about! []'s __________________ Non ducor, duco.

19th Feb 2007, 06:38 CET	#6
ShamRock Adequate Citizen Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 481 My Mood:	CS:S rather lets say CS Promode we all know what Arqon can do with his skills (seen in CPMA and Q4Max) CS Promode is the next CS Game thats for sure. Its only a matter of time once the bugs n hitbox values are fixed. It seems CS Promode is almost complete on what i have gathered from sources. I think the beta testing should start pretty soon. __________________ In this world of sin i hope to surrender to the holy bliss.

19th Feb 2007, 07:46 CET	#7
Guest Posts: n/a	CSS sucks fosho. But if tournaments decides to use the crappy version of CS then most team will have to follow their leads even if they hate it with a passion. But if CSS takes off, I hope CS1.6 becomes a legend, just like Starcraft the game will never die!

19th Feb 2007, 17:03 CET	#8
Ooopek Junior Citizen Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 61	it has a future. like someone sad there is so much money puting in this game, it must have a bright future.

19th Feb 2007, 17:15 CET	#9
mulisha Junior Citizen Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 94	#6!

19th Feb 2007, 17:26 CET	#10
OnceUponTime Junior Citizen Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 40	CS:S is more enjoyable to spectate and more lovely to play. I ain´t good in cs 1.6 or CS:S but the graphics plays too much in this case for me...

19th Feb 2007, 18:20 CET	#11
imported_clyde Newbie Citizen Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 5	CS:S are the best game ever. 1.6 is low! The graphic is terrible in 1.6 it makes no fun.

19th Feb 2007, 22:54 CET	#12
mulisha Junior Citizen Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 94	Graphics don't make a game, i find cs:s slow and also a hell of alot easier.

20th Feb 2007, 22:20 CET	#14
Guest Posts: n/a	There are 2 types of community here: 1.6 We are the real competitive gamers We are the pioneers of counterstrike. We are the ones who know how to play cs We care about the gameplay, not the graphics. We aim the heads for headshots. We don't have to spend $3000 to play. We know Valve's a bitch source We aim legs for headshots. We run around just to check out the amazing graphics that might set our computer on fire. We love spending $3000. We hate 1.6 because its too tough We play for the graphics!Not Gameplay! We love the flashbang in source and we love the bugs.. did i mention we love the graphics?

20th Feb 2007, 22:42 CET	#15
cr1stal Junior Citizen Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 32	the graphics are better for on tv to watch, so it depends on what the media dous. If the television wants a e-sports programme they probably choose source and everybody goes source. __________________ Can't Wait to head for the States - August 2008

21st Feb 2007, 06:55 CET	#16
tOxzj Junior Citizen Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 47	cs:s is colouring book for children! __________________ fly To style Of XZJ

21st Feb 2007, 09:03 CET	#17
technics Adequate Citizen Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 309	ur being a 1.6 fanboy apm, atleast try to be neutral when u make comparisons :]

21st Feb 2007, 11:57 CET	#18
shifty_ Newbie Citizen Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 6	I always thought of CS:S as being a newbie version, people who cant play 1.6 :P

22nd Feb 2007, 17:28 CET	#19
OnceUponTime Junior Citizen Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 40	We aim the heads for headshots. That can´t go for CS 1.6 or CS:S! I Laughed so hard how the fuck "Random" shooting got headshots (aiming just before him and guy who was like 800 m in front of him got headshot)

22nd Feb 2007, 18:50 CET	#20
Guest Posts: n/a	#16 i tried trust me. #18 at least 1.6 is less random than source thats fosho

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode