MYM - Replay Center

Search Replays

Filter by :

Details • 22.06.2008, 20:38 • posted by Alisha • 4523 Downloads

mouz vs XcN

mouz.Drayich

88 APM 5056 Actions

mouz.Fragalot

137 APM 7875 Actions

mouz.Miracle-

110 APM 6322 Actions

mouz.bluTgeiL

70 APM 4036 Actions

mouz.KuroKy

92 APM 5297 Actions

XcN-RitteR

205 APM 11791 Actions

xcn-mutz

96 APM 5561 Actions

XcN-stamx

138 APM 7960 Actions

xcn-melen

123 APM 7092 Actions

XcN-Lakuci

133 APM 7681 Actions

Related Coverage PDL Season 1 - PlayDay 1
Length 56 Minutes Version 1.21 TFT Map DotA Allstars v6.52c Downloads 4523 Download file Download replay Download without observer chat Last Download by ( 3 hours 39 minutes ago )	Tournament Prime Defending League #1 Spectators MYM\|d0t4bunny x3mwarning

Comments (30)

Page :

(last month) #1 kentutasu

imba ritter play meepo
XcN-RitteR
205 APM 11791 Actions = 2x drayich action xD

-My might can be matched-

(last month) #2 Red_Aces

thats cos when meepo hits level 6 and u give one action to both. its will be taken as 2 actions same goes for his next 2 ultis

(last month) #3 VieuMove

Are you sure ?
I find it hard to believe ...
I can't understand why giving an order to a group of 4 units would count as 4 orders...

(last month) #4 kentutasu

no thats not the case. else ritter would have 20k actions -My might can be matched-

(last month) #5 RAAMZES

It doesnt count like that....its way 2 stupid if apm counts like that,what to tell then for chen and visage....but meepo always has high apm coz if u are good with meepo u need to control all 4 of them...i mean every1 control all 4 XD but u need to keep them alive and that is much hard work :/

(last month) #7 myMYM\|UtherX

No you are wrong man :)
Red_Aces is correct. This is the reason that Starcraft players have over 600 apm - they are controling too many units.

Last edited by UtherX at 22.06.2008, 21:36

I'm the Enemy...

(last month) #8 RAAMZES

I know that,ok if u cast net with 1 then tab then with 2 tab and so on...but i understood him that if u click attack with all 4 that is like 4 actions and its not, maybe i just missunderstood him :))

(last month) #12 JoeZoo

It's easy to have high APM with Meepo no matter what. Anyone can just keep pressing tab+E over and over again, and combine that with Poof and it an easy 130apm. Anything after that is pure skill :D Go Ritter!

(last month) #16 alkarlosse

Quoting UtherX:

No you are wrong man :)
Red_Aces is correct. This is the reason that Starcraft players have over 600 apm - they are controling too many units.

600 apm isn't that a bit exaggerated?
and you are wrong, issuing a command to a group of units does count for a single action.

trust me, I've done replay parsing and apm calculating. essentially actions are hotkeys pressed and right clicks. doesn't matter how many units are in the group.

4fun ftw ^^

(last month) #18 ffreakk

That so? As far as my experience shows, hotkey-based commands even when issued in groups, only count as 1 action. However, action-based commands (like movements and attacks, etc) counts as 1 action per unit that is in the group.

(last month) #17 hellstar

600 apm? I think only ~350 for average pro player ...

DOTA COLA !!!

(last month) #19 myMYM\|UtherX

Yea u're right :>

1. Nada
APM: 375
EAPM: 258

2. Light
APM: 371
EAPM: 260

3. fOu
APM: 350
EAPM: 242

4. Casy
APM: 392
EAPM: 219

5. Baby
APM: 387
EAPM: 248

I'm the Enemy...

(last month) #20 sexyfats

that is still pretty crazy. 6 clicks a second. imagine that

(last month) #15 cr0os

YeS rItTeR Is VEri IMBAAAAA........... THE BEST MEEPO I EVER SEEN... GG.... xD

(last month) #6 dotch

should be marked as must see replay.
gg

(last month) #9 RAAMZES

totaly agree :) pretty good come back by XcN and a lot of actions 5v5 :D

(last month) #13 myMYM\|Alisha

hehe right, changed :)

(last month) #10 c0nMitashki

that was a 9 v 5 game thats why mouz lost :/ Amazing play by ritter GG

(last month) #11 nah_lo

xcn is da besttt

(last month) #14 darknight240

Lol when Xcn was 6-10 something Meepo had all the kills. Meepo carry whole game NP!

(last month) #21 sexyfats

so true. i quit watching when score was 18-9. looked bad when sp panda totally dominated a sk lina lane. two of my fave heroes made to look pretty shitty in this .52 :( with chen's help mouz was just unable to be antipushed. it looked bad so i went to sleep. gratz to xcn for the come back

(last month) #25 VkBanjkan3

What the fuck? It was SP + Panda vs Visage + Sandking, I don't see what chen had to do with it seeing as he wasn't in the replay. It was basically mislaned, Drayich seemed to have some kind of reluctance to use his mana as well, his first word was around level 7, with it he could've shut down the DK much more effectively.

(last month) #22 dingma1

You'd think warlock's fatal bonds could be anti meepo, but with 4 meepos along with 4 other heros, meepo actually manages to spread the fatal bonds thin, so it's not that effective... you'd really need loads of burst and/or ES to anti-meepo. It would be interesting to see the bans and pick order for this match. Now I've seen that meepo is absent from the second match probably cuz es is picked... Last edited by dingma1 at 23.06.2008, 18:08

(last month) #23 uGZeN08

Quoting dingma1:

Now I've seen that meepo is absent from the second match probably cuz es is picked...

duh... dey picked meepo last because they know they can manage it bec of lack of aoe... and if im right, it was a risk for showing off and it worked =D nice job xcn

(last month) #26 dingma1

in xcn's 2nd game vs +46 (which took place before this one), ritter went with meepo after +46 picked ES, zeus, lich - and they went on to win that game. in their 1st game vs +46 xcn-ritter picked meepo after +46 picked warlock, ES, QOP, VS - all of which could effectively be anti-meepo.

(last month) #24 xergey

wow kk wow imba meeponya ^^

(last month) #27 cmNdS

imba ^^^

(last month) #28 FearDarkNess-