Replays

There are currently no replays from this match.

 
Comments (15)

 

Page :
  • 1
(11 months ago)  #1 MYunderminer
 
Mineski msn contact

ronald_robins_dlsu@yahoo.com
(11 months ago)  #2 iamRA
iamRA
mineski gets dq'ed for backdooring the lvl2 + 80% hp of lvl 3 bottom towers
result reversed, DoP > mineski
next time be more carefull guys -.-
read the rules
:)
hf

-My might cannot be matched-
(11 months ago)  #3 DNRandoyX
andoyX
WTF? This is bad news... :'(
A world w/o walls and fences - who needs Windows and Gates?
(11 months ago)  #4 myMYM|GenoZStriker
GenoZStriker
Hmmm that is really sad indeed. Well rules are rules. The world revolves around rules and we just stick with them and move on. I feel really sorry for mineski. gl guys
Enjoy playing dota? Check out Demigod at "Demigodthegame.com
(11 months ago)  #5 mskirhomineski
 
s1rro, i request a meeting conference with admin + dop + mineski member
(11 months ago)  #6 mskirhomineski
 
what happened was, dop got a fatal error 8mins from 60 min to 52 min, that was we won clashes, we agreed to load the game with dop saying we will forgive the bd, since it was non intentional.... i request admin reconsideration pls.. talk to dop, btw, when we won, they said GG and left the game, there was no rax destroyed in the process...
(11 months ago)  #7 mskirhomineski
 
posted by emperor in dota-allstar forums:
This is true.
Can't say I agree with this here. For instance, juicing olympians still get stripped of their medals.

And no, we did not choose to keep going based on the team fight won. It was considered trivial when we thought chaos knight just backdoored to kill the 100 or so life on the bottom base tower, we did not realize that severe backdooring had taken place in the form of the whole 2nd level tower and most of the base tower. Mineski themselves claimed it was "only a hit" when it was far far more extreme than that. Not only did we further lose map control from it, but Chaos Knight also obtained considerable resources and it easily paved the path for them to do Roshan as we were pushed inside our base as a result.

rhomineski's reply:
emperor, as we talked before the load, we even agreed that we rm even if ur player got dc... you even said, it would be bad if it was to be finish unfairly, so we agreed to rm... that is the kind of team we are... regarding the db, i accept we made a mistake, but you also agreed to let it go when we also agreed to rm "both teams wanted GOOD GAME SINCE IT WAS A CLOSE ONE AND ALOT OF PEOPLE ARE AWAITING IT" if you were the one who made the petition of BD ... i said to myself OMG.... EMPEROR, that tower was not the deciding factor, you know it and i know it... if you are really proffesional enough to accept defeat i would really appreciate it, but considering we join 5 ol events at the same time, it is just human nature to make a mistake, and since you agreed to play on even if it happened... we even dropped sweat til last clash knowing that DR can turn the tide on any match.... i would like to request appeal on ur behalf on accepting defeat to admin...
Last edited by rhomineski at 06.02.2008, 07:25
(11 months ago)  #8 DoPHizaki
Hizaki
We are not talking about the 10 hp tower that you killed. It was when your entire team decided to take out a 2nd level tower and then proceed to bring down our base tower to low health. That's two (2) instances of backdoor that we DID NOT SEE, UNTIL AFTER THE GAME FINISHED. Then we finally caught the third backdoor when your CK one-shotted our base tower. THAT was why we did not think it was a big deal, because we did not realize that you backdoored both our towers, not just landing one hit on it. That is 400 to your entire team, +~400 gold per tower for whoever killed it, +ability to do roshan (since we can't stop your team from roshan with all those creeps pushing in) +the aegis, +800 gold to entire team, +~300 for whoever killed roshan. How much gold is that?
(11 months ago)  #9 kentutasu
 
that's really weird.

why don't just deny those towers?

seriously, the rules need to be changed.

"you may backdoor a deniable tower"

(doesn't change the fact mski broke the rules by BDing full HP towers)

-My might can be matched-
(11 months ago)  #10 SlavikAstra
Astra
rofl
slavik pro
(11 months ago)  #11 CORPOyAJQt
 
i havent seen the replay yet.. but in my opinion based on the result and given facts i think that the moderator or admin of mym should have to call for a meeting between team mineski and dop. as far as i know mineski has evidence to support their appeal against dop. mineski should be given the chance. in this kind of respected league the winner should be deserving.
Last edited by yAJQt at 07.02.2008, 09:12
(11 months ago)  #12 testing123
 
im just curious on why the replay has yet to be posted and if the admin decision is final that win is awarded to DoP for the backdoor...
(11 months ago)  #13 veilside25
veilside25
well thats the way life goes ... :) good luck next tournament mski
(11 months ago)  #14 aki18th
 
this issue has been resolved already by the captains of both teams. gudluck to DOP on their next matches. better luck next time mineski. I still think u did well.^^
(11 months ago)  #15 NewbieKill
NewbieKill
No improvement menski clan in dota. Jickoy was loss more thousand pesos vs minski clan. in cebu.

Page :
  • 1


In order to post comments you must be logged in. You will be forwarded automatically to the feature you were trying to access.



If you do not have an account yet, you can register to the MYM Community in less than one minute.
Registering won't only allow you to read the latest coverage on current events, but also give you the oportunity to take part in an uprising gaming community and meet new people, aswell as new friends.Register now and be a part of the MeetYourMakers community.
The American StarCraft player, iNcontroL will take part in an American reality TV show....
show more news
show more team news
Without a word: KnochenNow it is time for something unique - an interview without any words! myMYM|BeeemIt asked the questions but this time the German commentator Knochen wasn't supposed to say anything, but to show "with...